Basil Venitis asserts that religion is spiritual slavery. Church is the business of religion. Religious monopoly turns bishops to ayatollahs, and churches to Sodom and Gomor. Spirituality and metaphysics should replace religion. Faith is retarded thinking that keeps you away from God. You have to become faithless, in order to start your journey to God! You have to discover God your own way without intermediaries. God's truth should replace faith.
Many of us have heard about Geert Wilders, the venitist Dutch parliamentarian currently on trial in Holland because he criticized Islam. Fitna is a 2008 film by Dutch MP Geert Wilders. It shows selected excerpts from Suras of the Quran, interspersed with media clips and newspaper cuttings showing or describing acts of violence and hatred by Muslims. The film demonstrates the Quran motivates its followers to hate all who violate Islamic teachings. The film argues that Islam encourages acts of terrorism, antisemitism, violence against women, violence and subjegation of infidels and against homosexuals and Islamic universalism. The Arabic title-word fitna means disagreement and division among people. It's a call to shake off the creeping tyranny of Islamization.
Quran calls for hatred, misogyny, polygyny, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. Quran calls for Muslims to kill infidels, to terrorize infidels, and to fulfil their duty to wage war, the violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every motherfucker Muslim ape, Islam is to rule the world by the sword. Quran is clearly antisemitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs. Quran is similar to Hitler's Mein Kampf, but Bible is similar to Aesop's Fables.
Venitist Selwyn Duke points out it's shocking to all venitists that you could be charged with a hate crime for expressing an opinion, but such prosecutions are not unheard of in the Western world beyond American shores. After all, most nations have nothing tantamount to our First Amendment. But could such a thing happen in the land of the free as well?
Duke notes that if a human relations task force in California has its way, the answer will be yes. Its victims are two Lancaster, Calif., city officials: Mayor R. Rex Parris and Councilman Sherry Marquez. Their sins? Parris told a group of Christian ministers, "We are growing Christian community — and don't let anybody shy away from that." And Marquez posted quotations on her Facebook page from Muslim leaders encouraging adherents to win the world for Islam along with excerpts from the Bible that encourage Christians to defend themselves.
Mohammed was a charlatan, a bipolar maniac, a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and a misogynist. Islamic tradition tells us how Mohammed had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side. Here is an emoticon of Mohammed with a lit bomb in his turban *-O)):-{>
Mayor Parris had expressed his sentiments previously as well, during a State of the City address; this prompted a federal civil-rights complaint by the Council on American-Islamic Relations based on the separation-of-church-and-state principle. Now, while the mayor didn't violate the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause (properly understood), this isn't surprising given how it is almost universally misinterpreted and misapplied. But now some are pushing the envelope and wish to do to freedom of speech what has already been done to freedom of religion. Venitist Jody Brown notes that "according to the Antelope Valley Press, the local human relations task force will convene to discuss whether those remarks could potentially be hate incidents. Darren Parker, chairman of the task force, tells the newspaper that if the mayor's comments are so deemed, a complaint will be made to the federal Justice Department' and to state and county district attorneys.
Wow, let's get this straight: In the land of the free and home of the brave you could conceivably be charged with a hate crime for expressing opinions and desires? Venitis asserts that the clash of cultures has erupted. Islam is not a religion, but a satanic terrorist cacoculture. Sure, it has a grudge-collecting god, and an afterlife with 72 virgins for each martyr. But in its essence, Islam is a political ideology and sadomasochism. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means submission. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is the incivility of terrorist sharia.
Don't get Duke wrong, Duke doubts this effort will result in actual charges at this juncture. But the fact that some among us would even conceive of such a thing should send chills up any constitutional spine. Worse still, many other Americans are asleep at the wheel, as a perusal of the comments under Brown's piece proves. The respondents got bogged down talking about religion in the public sphere, totally ignoring that speech in the public sphere is also now under assault. Understand, for instance, that the hate-speech police aim to silence all criticism of Islam — whether it emanates from religious or secular mouths.
This is why you should know that hate speech is but a euphemism for "expression the tolerance crowd just won't tolerate" — meaning, anything they can't refute in the arena of ideas. Yet, there is also a Trojan horse here, one of which most are unaware. Duke speaks of the local human relations task force.
Sharia means the slavish domination of women, rule by Muslims, intolerance of and discrimination towards non-Muslims, and the end of freedom. Ironically, our soldiers are now fighting foreign wars, suffering and dying for societies that are committed to the enforcement of Sharia, while at the same time we have to fight against the forces of Sharia in this country. Let those motherfucker Muslims fight between themselves, not with us. Let them kill each other, not our boys. Our mere presence in Islamist countries, automatically makes us a target, uniting all these motherfuckers against us.
Understand that in Canada — where citizens have been prosecuted for criticizing Islam and homosexuality — the inquisitor entities are called human rights commissions or human rights tribunals. Of course, the term human rights sounds like something no one should object to, just as hate speech sounds like something everyone should object to. That's the whole idea: People won't knowingly embrace tyranny, so you must cloak it in an appealing guise. But here's why Duke mentions these bureaucracies: They have proliferated in our nation as well.
Don't believe Duke? Just check your county government, as odds are they have already instituted a human rights commission. Oh, this doesn't mean they'll be arresting your politically incorrect tongue today or tomorrow. After all, no precedent justifying that has yet been established in American jurisprudence. But once one is, all bets are off. Because with human rights commissions peppering Uncle Sam, the mechanism for tyranny is already in place. The thought police will be able to hit the ground chasing. Then we will find out that some people's conception of human rights sounds a lot more like human wrongs.
Terrorist Islam demands us to surrender, but we shout the heroic molon-lave of the 300 Spartans of Leonidas and the mighty words of Winston Churchill:
We shall fight on the seas and shores.
We shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air.
We shall defend our land whatever the cost maybe.
We shall fight on the beaches.
We shall fight on the landing grounds.
We shall fight in the fields and the streets.
We shall fight in the hills. But…
WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER!
